Tag Archive for google wave

A niche future for SM developers?

It’s all a bit quiet at the moment, isn’t it? This is my first post in nearly a month which is shameful, I know, but I just haven’t really spotted anything worth mentioning or opining over.

Google Buzz was a flash in the pan, and from what I’ve seen hasn’t had much of an uptake – maybe regular Gmail users will use it a lot, but I certainly don’t check it much. Google Wave has levelled off too.

The problem with Wave was that it was complicated if you weren’t a techie, but it did seem fairly active for a while. But now even the most active waves in my inbox have died off.

Twitter is still going strong, and Facebook is doing its thing quite happily, but I wonder if perhaps we’ve reached a plateau? Twitter and Facebook are massively successful, probably too successful and well established for any other app to come along and seriously compete. They don’t have to worry about each other; Twitter is broadcasty, for us to shout to, at and with the world whereas Facebook is more for close-knit community networking and one-to-one discussion.

If Twitter is the Microsoft of social networking, and Facebook is the Apple, then stuff like Wave, Buzz and the others are the little customised versions of Linux that you get on netbooks.

It could be that things have quieted lately because we’re seeing a calm before the storm. With Twitter due to release a load of new features on to the web interface maybe other developers are holding back. Maybe.

I think it’s more likely, though, that they’re not even trying to compete in the first place. The main reason for the success of Twitter and Facebook is that when it comes to it, they’re just downright good fun! That’s a market they’ve got cornered – so if you’re trying to develop a new social network then it better be the most fun you can have online without hearing the word “HEADSHOT!” or you might as well not even bother.

The future of social media, I reckon, lies in targetted development. For smaller developers to survive in a world dominated by Twitter and Facebook they need to start developing custom SM apps and tools for businesses and organisations and trade sectors. Like a scaled-down LinkedIn.

LinkedIn is 3 years older than Facebook, it’s still going strong with 60 million users worldwide (I was among the first million. Just sayin’) and it has never felt threatened by, or the need to compete with, Facebook. Why? Because it is aimed purely at professionals seeking work and contacts.

So before the Social Media Sci-Fi Apocalypse, I think we’ll see a lot of break-away developers trying to narrow their focus and cater to a niche. I joked about it in the post I just linked to, but when it comes to competing with Facebook and Twitter resistence really is futile.

Addendum: On an unrelated note….if you can please tune in to BBC Radio Scotland at 0900 tomorrow (Monday 7th March). There will be a documentary on about prostate cancer. It was written and produced by a friend of mine, John Thomson, who is himself a recovered prostate cancer patient. It promises to be informative and entertaining. If you can’t tune in tomorrow, check it on the iPlayer later.

Share on Twitter
Share on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

Ne quid false dicere audeas, ne quid veri non.

Yup.

What? Oh, right, well it’s latin actually. It means “To assert no falsehood and to hide no truth” and it’s the motto of the Caledonian Mercury where I’ve been doing some work experience for uni.

It’s been an interesting experience. Although I didn’t get a by-line, as all their writing is done by hand-picked staffers and freelances, I did get some valuable insight into the way an online operation is run and the part that Social Media has to play in it. My job this week mainly revolved around tweeting links to new stories as they went live, sticking them on the Facebook page – yes, a newspaper with a Facebook page; that’s why it’s going to work! – and sorting out the following of followers and all that jazz.

On Thursday I emailed Stewart a few thoughts on how they could be using Google Wave too, so we’ll see what comes of that, if anything. I think it’s a good idea and it’s in keeping with the paper’s mission statement and ideals. I’m not going to say what it is right now but if they go for it and it works you can expect a post entitled “That was my idea!”

So what did I learn? Well, it’s taken a few days of calming my brain down (yesterday’s MAMJ News Day did NOT help with that!) to figure it all out. I knew it was worthwhile; I just wasn’t sure why. I am now.

What last week gave me was more valuable than a few paragraphs and a by-line. In Stewart Kirkpatrick I made a cracking contact – a wee gesture at the end of the week, while a bit cheesy, should make sure he remembers me – but even that was not the most worthwhile part.

I saw a new venture launch, successfully, from an almost 100% online and social media platform.

The Caledonian Mercury promoted itself completely on Twitter and AllMediaScotland, and on that first day it was almost viral. Word spread, links were tweeted and retweeted, and before the end of day 1 the site had smashed its projected traffic numbers for the year.

So what last week gave me was hope. If the CalMerc works (and if anyone is qualified to make it work it’s Stewart) then others will follow. Journalists – proper journos, not school kids with camera phones – will be in demand again. As long as they have the skills for online work, that is.

Journalism as an industry needs the internet. It needs social media. And it needs journalists who can ply their trade effectively across the online and SM worlds.

I think the Mercury will work. I can’t really say why, but I got the feeling I was in at the start of something big, in more ways than one.

I’ve been inspired with a renewed belief in the career I’ve chosen. I’ve been inspired to get Planet Holyrood’s blogs back up and running (this weekend – watch for it.)

New year, new vigour, new me. Maybe not that last one.

Maybe it’ll all be ok.

Share on Twitter
Share on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

To Wave or not to Wave?

That is the question. Whether ’tis easier in the mind to just use email, to suffer the slings and arrows crashes and error messages of outrageous fortune Outlook Express*, or take arms against a sea of troubles and by opposing, end them?

*other email clients are available and just as buggy if not more so.

Yup, the KG blog goes all cultured on you and hits you with a bit of Hamlet.

You see, I’ve been using Google Wave for a few weeks now and I think I’ve got my head round it. Google have created what I believe could become the next evolution of email and are making Waves in a sea of email troubles.

The basic functions are the same as email.

You type up a message, attach files if required, and send it to the recipient. Where Wave augments this basic funtionality is its collaborative capabilities.

If the recipient of the message I just sent is online then they can respond instantly, edit something I’ve already written, add to it, add participants to the wave, add pictures, embed a video…and who knows what else as time goes on?

Google Wave is still in public Beta, and as such it’s a wee bit tricky for the less web-savvy user. The search parameters are horrible. I happened upon them by accident and have since pointed a few well experienced web users in their direction.

The application as a whole, while built around the Web 2.0, does seem to be a bit resource hungry. There’s almost no point trying to use it on my Acer Aspire One running Linux, and if I’ve got a few Firefox tabs plus Photoshop open on the windows desktop then Wave can slow to a frustrating crawl.

But that aside, it’s a good idea with the potential to transform working practise for anyone who needs to collaborate with others in their work.

Now, I’m a technology geek and I have the horrible habit of assuming that if you’re reading my blog, or following me on Twitter, then you’re geek too. But maybe you’re not a geek. And just maybe you have no idea what Google Wave actually is.

I’m not going to tell you.

All I’m going to say is that it’s a collaborative editing tool, and the best description I’ve heard was on this chap’s blog where he describes it as “multiplayer Word.” You can also take a look at a post by Cristiana Theodoli on how it could shape the newsrooms of the future.

What I’ve been using it for has, by and large, been just a bit of experimentation with the capabilities. I used it to get some comments and ideas from sci-fi fans about a feature I was writing for uni, I used it to let my colleagues proof read said feature and I used it to make contact with a bunch of other journalism students in another university.

That last one is interesting. My lot are the MAMJs (MA Multimedia Journalism) and the other lot are the MAOJs (MA Online Journalism). We’re from Glasgow, they’re from Birmingham. There’s been some good chat back and forth between a few of us, but it seems to be only 2 or 3 from each side who are actually participating.

I’ve also tried setting up a LinkedIn directory wave – we’ll see where that goes.

Ultimately I’m quite excited about where Google Wave could go. If you read Cristiana’s post, linked to above, and consider along with that that Sky News have installed TweetDeck on every journalist’s PC and told them to get tweeting, then the newsroom of the future is just around the corner.

I can’t stress enough how important it is for anyone studying journalism, or anyone employed in journalism who wants to stay there for the forseeable future, to either get their heads around Wave or go gentle in to that good night (Dylan Thomas? My, I’m on literary form today!).

I have some invites left. Get in touch via Twitter if you want one.

Share on Twitter
Share on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

Social Media – the Revolution Will Not Be Very Interesting

I’m a bit of a geek. More than a bit, actually, I’m a card-carrying nerd. As I type this I’ve got Google Wave open in another window, Twitter running on my Blackberry and Last.fm introducing me to a variety of new musical delights via XBox Live (any spare Spotify invites would not go unappreciated got one – from my mum!).

So when a new technological Next Big Thing is announced I naturally take an interest and follow its development. If it’s online I may register for the Beta test. I rarely get on to a Beta first time, mostly it’s through invites from other Beta testers; like when I got onto Google Wave through asking (and asking and asking and asking) around for an invite on Twitter.

I find stuff like that exciting, so I was surprised to find that many of my peers don’t. It’s not just that they don’t find it exciting, they don’t even find it boring either…they just don’t care.

When I finally got some Google Wave invites of my own the first thing I did was offer them around my student colleagues on the MA Multimedia Journalism course. I think three people accepted. Three! Out of 25!

Now since then a few more have taken invites and are on Wave, but I can’t help but feel that they should have been biting my hand off for an invite. Wave has so much potential to become a powerful journalistic tool – see this post by my buddy Cristiana Theodoli – and I think it’s so important for Multimedia journalists to wrap their heads around it early on; but in the majority of cases my offer of invites was either ignored or met with the reply “What’s Google Wave?”

I think the problem is that there’s just too much out there.

MySpace came along and sucked everybody in; Bebo got its share of that action and then Facebook arrived and established itself by targeting a more mature demographic and specialising in creating social interest groups. Social Bookmarking crept up behind everyone and sneaked in while nobody was looking, then Twitter landed and everyone wondered, in 140 characters or less, exactly what the point of it was.

We’re being told that we need a Twitter account, we need a blog, we need a Facebook, we need to be on LinkedIn, we should be using Posterous, we should be using Digg, we should be making Audioboos, we should be using Delicious….Aaaaaarrrgh!!!

Is it any wonder that many of the people who should be invested in this stuff have become apathetic? People feel overwhelmed and under pressure to have a ‘presence’ in the online space.

As I see it this problem will lead to two scenarios:

  1. In industries where a knowledge of SM is becoming a prerequisite only those who, like me and a few colleagues, live and breathe this stuff will make the cut. Take journalism as an example: an editor asks me at a job interview if I would be capable of tweeting out a bit.ly link to the paper’s new public wave. I can say yes without a problem – what about the poor guy who doesn’t have a clue what he’s just been asked?
  2. The second scenario is a given. One of the few natural processes in a technological environment is convergence. At some point, very soon, somebody is going to crate an all-in-one application that’ll sweep the others away and consign them to the history books alongside mixed-tapes, VCRs, and the race for Christmas number one (oh, wait…)

    It’ll be Web 2.0, maybe Adobe AIR, probably both and definitely available for iPod, Blackberry, Google Phone etc. Whatever platform it comes on is unimportant – that point is that’s it’s inevitable.

What’s also inevitable is that even as the world of Social Media and Social Networking is made easier and more accessible there will still be people out there who should be getting involved but won’t be all that interested, and that’s no bad thing as far as I’m concerned.

Personally, as much as I’d find the convergence of the social media space an exciting prospect, I hope it takes a long time. The longer we live with scenario 1 the better – it cuts down the competition!

Share on Twitter
Share on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This